Categories
The Occupation 100 Years Later

The Occupation Begins

On July 28, 1915, more than 300 U.S. marines landed in Haiti, ostensibly to stabilize the political situation on the island. As a New York Times article at the time put it, “We are not there for conquest. We are there for peace and order primarily, and incidentally for instruction.” Yet the outcome would be closer to conquest than to peace, with U.S. forces remaining in control of Haiti for almost two decades. Incidental instruction turned into a grand nation-building experiment.

When President Woodrow Wilson announced the rationale for the occupation, he focused on the brutal murder of Haitian President Guillaume Sam that occurred in late July of 1915. But in fact, plans had long been in the works for an occupation of Haiti: as early as 1914, the U.S. had already drafted an announcement of the occupation with only the date left blank. The occupation had long been desired by U.S. financial institutions, especially First National City Bank of New York whose leadership had in the early 1900s been acquiring investments in Haiti such as the Banque National d’Haïti and the rights to build a Haitian national railroad. The U.S. secretary of state, William Jennings Bryan knew little about the island: after one briefing, he apparently marveled at being told about “N*****s speaking French.” As a result, Bryan relied heavily on advice from National City’s Vice President Roger Farnham, who would be put in charge of Haiti’s finances once the occupation began. All of National City’s pre-1915 desires for the island—a new constitution allowing foreign ownership of property, U.S. control of all of Haiti’s revenues, dissolution of a recalcitrant Haitian legislature to be replaced by a president deferential to U.S. decisions—would be imposed in the early years of the occupation.

What the occupation therefore yielded was a paradise for foreign capital. Investors like National City Bank eagerly acquired Haitian debt previously owned by France, much of which remained from the famous 1825 indemnity in which Haiti agreed to pay today’s equivalent of $40 billion to compensate the French for property lost when their slaves rebelled and declared their freedom. This debt became especially attractive during the occupation since U.S. lenders could have full confidence that, with the U.S. in absolute control of Haitian finances, all revenues would be would be diverted into debt-repayment rather than spending on local projects. Without any funds left over to spend locally, major infrastructure projects during the occupation such as the building of a super-highway system throughout the island to enable the movement of military troops for pacification purposes were carried out by conscripted labor that The Nation likened to “the African slave raids of past centuries.” Haiti became essentially a vassal for U.S. finance, in some years devoting up to 80% of GDP towards servicing foreign debt. The outcome for Haiti was much less positive than for its U.S. investors. National City Bank’s successor, Citigroup, is today one of the most profitable corporations in the U.S., even as Haiti continues to struggle with international debt.

The political situation created during the occupation also reverberated throughout the twentieth century. The U.S. dissolved all of the island’s political institutions and created in their place a constabulary, officered by U.S. marines, that served as de facto government of the island. The stated goal throughout the latter years of the occupation was to train Haitians to take over this institution in order to leave them responsible for the island’s security after U.S. forces departed. The U.S. did the same thing in their occupations of the Dominican Republic and Nicaragua during this period, ending those occupation by leaving constabulary officers Rafael Trujillo and Anastasio Somoza to become two of the hemisphere’s most ruthless U.S. trained dictators. In Haiti, the centralization of power under a militarized police lay the ground for François “Papa Doc” Duvalier and his infamous Tonton Macoutes to terrorize the country for decades. Haiti’s political dysfunction today comes directly from these reorganized institutions.

Haiti one-hundred years after the occupation is thus the product of this U.S. experiment in nation-building. Being able to reflect on the occupation from the perspective of a century, we can judge its success by considering the new Haiti that it created. The occupation made Haiti one of the Caribbean nations most thoroughly incorporated into the U.S. sphere of influence, a laboratory for free-market ideas that would restructure the island and leave behind new governmental and economic systems that would endure on the island throughout the twentieth century. Haiti would become a source of cheap labor for U.S. industry (for example, all Major League baseballs were hand-sewn in Haiti for decades) and a site of pure profit for Wall Street lenders looking for high returns on loans backed by the might of the U.S. military. The Haitian people, from the occupation until today, have borne the brunt of this profiteering.

Yet the occupation of Haiti also shows how this exploitation was fought and overcome. The occupation only ended after thousands of Haitians had died fighting against U.S. military forces. The turning point came in 1929. A general strike resulted in marines firing on and killing unarmed protesters, finally turning world public opinion against the occupation. From this point forward, the occupation came to be considered a failure and embarrassment to U.S. foreign policy. By its last few years, successive U.S. presidents were focused only on figuring out a dignified way to withdraw military forces from the island. Today, we must remember these early victims of Wall Street greed, who a century ago suffered from, stood up against, and eventually drove U.S. forces out of Haiti.

For more information about the occupation, see:

Categories
The Occupation 100 Years Later

The Election of Dartiguenave

On August 12, 1915, Philippe Sudre Dartiguenave was elected president of Haiti in a process controlled by the U.S. marines occupying the island. Dartiguenave had offered assurances that he would agree to the U.S. goals of the occupation–control of Haitian finances, ceding land for U.S. naval and military bases, and resolving conflicts the previous Haitian government had with U.S. banks and the U.S.-owned National Railway.

U.S. cabinet officials had taken to mockingly calling U.S. Secretary of the Navy Josephus Daniels, “Josephus the First, King of Haiti,” and asked Daniels jokingly if Dartiguenave, “the candidate you […] picked” would manage to be elected.

Less than a month after this election, U.S. occupation forces would declare martial law on September 3, 1915, which would suspend freedom of the press and assembly and give U.S. marines wide latitude for dealing with opposition to the occupation. Dartiguenave would serve as president of Haiti for almost 7 years, even as the marines retained control over the government’s executive functions during that period.

See Hans Schmidt, The United States Occupation of Haiti, 1915-1934. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995. p. 72-74

Categories
The Occupation 100 Years Later

Franklin D. Roosevelt in Haiti

In January 1917, Franklin D. Roosevelt traveled to Haiti. With the Marine Corps in control of Haiti, the occupation was part of Roosevelt’s portfolio as Assistant Secretary of the Navy. While running for Vice President in 1920, Roosevelt would even boast that he had personally written Haiti’s constitution, though the occupation forces had already drafted it by the time of Roosevelt’s visit.

As historian Hans Schmidt puts it, while in Haiti “Roosevelt did little more than give an unqualified endorsement to marine activities, engage in ceremonial functions, and investigate possibilities of investment in Haiti for his own personal enrichment” (108). Roosevelt was seeking to set up a plantation along with John McIlhenny, the highest ranking U.S. civilian official in Haiti, and Major Henry L. Roosevelt, a distant cousin who was at the time a marine stationed in Haiti and would later become assistant secretary of the navy during FDR’s presidency. FDR spent his visit looking for potential sites for the plantation, in anticipation of the new constitution that would legalize foreign land ownership.

McIlhenny became financial adviser to Haiti (putting him for practical purposes in charge of all decisions about Haitian finances) and the conflict of interest made him unable to pursue the investment deal; he wrote to Roosevelt assuring him that he would resign from his post in order to proceed, but was unable to resign and the plan fell through.

Roosevelt would eventually inherit full control of the occupation when elected president more than a decade later, and would oversee the long winding down of the occupation by 1934.

See Hans Schmidt, The United States Occupation of Haiti, 1915-1934. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995. pp. 108-111.

Categories
The Occupation 100 Years Later

The Dissolution of the Haitian Legislature

On June 19, 1917, Major General Smedley Butler led a group of U.S. Marines into the Haitian National Assembly to dissolve that body when the Haitian representatives refused to ratify the new constitution that the U.S. wanted implemented. The U.S.-authored constitution was designed to make foreign investment and ownership of property easier, in response to lobbying by the National City Bank of New York (today’s Citigroup).

The dissolution of the Haitian legislature began the phase of the U.S. occupation marked by violence, censorship, and authoritarian rule. Local representative government would not be restored in Haiti for more than a decade.

See Hans Schmidt, The United States Occupation of Haiti, 1915-1934. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995. p. 97.